Roger Stone Floats Michelle Obama as the Democrat Presidential Contender

Of course, Stone is bloviating and flossing, because the faithful at these types of conventions did not hear it from him first. They heard it way back in 2022 at CPAC, where this ridiculous theory was also floated. Former Trump treasury secretary Monica Crowley was on a panel at CPAC 2022 and said, pretty much the same thing.

Monica Crowley, a former treasury spokeswoman, was speaking on Saturday at CPAC, the conservative conference in Orlando, Florida, at which Donald Trump strongly suggested he will run again in two years’ time.

“If [Democrats] were to run Michelle Obama,” Crowley said, during a panel session, “that would put us in a very difficult position because they’d reach for a candidate who is completely plausible, very popular, and immune to criticism.

“Also, when you think about her positioning, she [was a Democratic convention] keynote speaker in 2020, she wrote her autobiography [Becoming, a bestseller] and did a 50-city tour, she has massive Netflix and Spotify deals, and she’s got a voting rights group alongside [the Georgia politician and campaigner] Stacey Abrams.”

And it is for those very reasons that Michelle Obama will not run. The Obamas live a comfortable life of influence from a very high perch on Martha’s Vineyard. Michelle was NEVER keen on campaigning and pretending she liked the rabble. She is much more comfortable amongst her champagne Leftist fellow travelers. Obama has also stated in several interviews that she hated D.C. While she loves the attention and influence, she loves money more, and as long as she can milk this elder stateswoman/Black royalty persona, she’ll do it; and she can do it forever.

The Bidens are craven, but not very bright. They know no other way than government positions and influence to keep their grift going. Barack and Michelle have perfected their grift outside of the government edifices and are doing well at it. They’re not going to upset that apple cart.

My colleague Ward Clark made this salient point:

Michelle Obama has never faced serious opposition for anything in her adult life. Not in her patronage job as “Vice President for Community and External Affairs” (whatever that is) at the University of Chicago Hospitals, to her tenure as First Lady, to… whatever it is she does now. Even if the Democrats ran a no-opposition coronation for her through their primary process, at some point she would have to stand up and debate someone like Donald Trump or Ron DeSantis, and she is in no way prepared or capable of taking that on.

Exactly. When has Michelle Obama ever been challenged or called out on her viewpoints to her face and been forced to defend them? Never, and it’s not going to happen any time soon.

Stone was also incorrect in his assessment that the only one that can “replace a woman of color is another woman of color.” The 2020 election allowed Democrats to check off the woman and Black boxes on the intersectionality punchcard. We have Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson for Pete’s sake. That idea is now passe. So, who’s next in line? The first TRANSGENDER Vice President or President. Paging Admiral Rachel Levine, or equally as good (a Drag Queen like RuPaul, perhaps?). That would kill at least two intersectional birds with one stone. RuPaul is also more attractive and likable than Levine by a long shot.

They have already rigged their primaries. The reason they have cancelled the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primaries is to put South Carolina, a state where the majority of the Democrat primary voters are African Americans, and they will allow Gavin Newsom to purchase the vice presidential nomination but the Obamas will hold him up for six or eight million dollars to do so.

This prediction is also way off base. The Obamas and the Newsom/Getty/Pelosi complex cannot stand each other. Barack Obama and former Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti were as thick as thieves during the Obama administration, so if that possibility were floated, it would make sense. But there is no love lost between the White Privilege represented by Newsom and Black Entitlement represented by the Obamas.

Newsom will make a run for president, but not in any type of partnership with the Obamas. That’s just not going to happen.

Why does the Alt-Right insist on floating Michelle Obama as president? What is the attraction? I think part of it is that VP Kamala Harris is absolutely no challenge. She’s a disaster and a political lightweight as Vice President. Her own party wants her gone, and her entire political career has been built on quid pro quo of one form or another. Harris will be easily bought off to step aside for whomever the Democrats might choose to replace Dementia Joe. Like the Obamas, Harris is allergic to actual work and governance. She enjoys being a symbol without investing any real sweat equity to earn that status.