We heard the closing arguments in the Fani Willis/Nathan Wade disqualification matter in Fulton County on Friday. But it seems to be the matter that doesn’t want to end, and there is continuing drama. Since the closing arguments wrapped, we’ve now had two instances of alleged new evidence crop up.
As we reported, there was a waiter who identified himself to one of the defense attorneys, Ashleigh Merchant. The waiter alleged that he saw Terrence Bradley meeting with Nathan Wade and Wade’s attorney about five weeks ago. He said he called Merchant after he heard Bradley testify that he hadn’t spoken to Wade in about two years.
Read More: More Bad News for Fani Willis As Megyn Kelly Drops One Final Surprise in Disqualification Matter
Now, there’s more. According to a new filing from the attorneys for defendant David Shafer, there’s a new witness, Co-Chief Deputy District Attorney for Cobb County Cindi Lee Yeager.
The filing says Yeager had multiple conversations with Bradley about the relationship between Willis and Wade between August 2023 and January 2024. Yeager indicated that Bradley said he had personal knowledge of the relationship and included details regarding the use of Robin Yeartie’s apartment and other meetings prior to November 2021 and that “Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020.”
But on top of that, Yeager says that she overheard a call from Willis to Terrence Bradley in September 2023. Willis was calling about an article that was published about how much money Wade and his partners were paid in the case.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) March 4, 2024
"Mr. Wade had definitively begun a romantic relationship with Ms. Willis during the time that Ms. Willis was running for District Attorney in 2019 through 2020" pic.twitter.com/jGerSWoL9V
“Ms. Yeager heard District Attorney #FaniWillis tell Mr. Bradley: “They are coming after us. You don’t need to talk to them about anything about us.”
Yeager said she came forward because what Bradley testified to was so different than what he told her — that it was “directly contrary.”
"Ms. Yeager watched Mr. Bradley’s testimony before the Court and became concerned as a result of the fact that what Mr. Bradley testified to on the witness stand was directly contrary to what Mr. Bradley had told Ms. Yeager in person" pic.twitter.com/ow1E8ekqby
— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) March 4, 2024
Judge Scott McAfee said after the closing arguments that he was going to make a decision in about two weeks. It remains to be seen if he would need to hear any of this information or allow it into evidence. He may already have enough to make his decision. But add just a few more nails into the story with regard to Willis and Wade with this. None of this information sounds like Bradley was “speculating” when he was talking about the romantic relationship, as he claimed in court. If Willis and Wade weren’t already cooked with what has been presented so far, this would certainly add to it.
how much evidence of perjury do we need to prosecute this woman and her lover? had she been white or republican it would have been over in a day and pre-convicted. She was using Trump for two reasons. to destroy his chances to be on the ballot and make a name for herself as the one who destroyed president Trump. All the efforts to keep Trump from the presidency has failed. What the American people can or will do is what I want to know. Truly it is our freedom to choose who will be president not a party. either republican or democrat. We have seen just what lengths these corrupt politicians will go to protect their power. I see only two paths that will keep Trump from the White house. they will murder him, or start a war, declaring martial law and cancel the transfer of power or just cancel the election. Their desperation grows as will their actions.——- I, Grampa