in

Chip Roy Voted ‘No’ on Rashida Tlaib Censure Resolution – Here’s Why

As RedState reported, on Wednesday evening, the House took up Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-GA) resolution to censure Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) over her antisemitic rants and provoking of a protest (“insurrection” under J6 rules) at the Cannon Building in the U.S. Capitol Complex in the wake of the Israel-Hamas War. 

The resolution failed by a vote of 222 to 186, with 22 Republicans siding with Democrats to shoot it down. Understandably, many on the right were beyond aggravated over the seeming inability/unwillingness of Republicans to force Democrats to live by their own rules. As Bonchie observed:

Remember, censure is simply a formal condemnation of a member. It is not expulsion, though, Tlaib should be up for that as well. Yet, Republicans can’t even come together to do something that simple? What is even the point of the GOP? 
Sure, Republican politicians produce a lot of rhetoric. They say a lot of things that are supposed to make voters feel good, but when handed a lay-up, they still choose to pass the ball. Does anyone think a party that can’t do something as simple and justified as censuring Tlaib will turn around and hold the line on major spending issues?

Greene herself took to social media to call out the Republicans who voted the measure down.

Some of the names on the list aren’t terribly surprising. One that stood out, however, was Chip Roy (R-TX), who is generally considered a rock-solid conservative and certainly not one to cut Tlaib or the Hamas Caucus slack over their odious stances. 

Following the vote, Roy issued a statement explaining the rationale behind his vote. 

“Rep. Rashida Tlaib has repeatedly made outrageous remarks toward Israel and the Jewish people. Her conduct is unbecoming of a member of Congress and certainly worthy of condemnation – if not censure.
“However, tonight’s feckless resolution to censure Tlaib was deeply flawed and made legally and factually unverified claims, including the claim of leading an ‘insurrection’.
“I voted to table the resolution. In January 2021, the legal term insurrection was stretched and abused by many following the events at the Capitol.  We should not continue to perpetuate claims of ‘insurrection’ at the Capitol and we should not abuse the term now.” -Rep. Roy

This may ruffle some feathers, but I don’t necessarily disagree with Roy’s point here. Maybe it’s the legal training, but I believe that legal documents — even mere resolutions with no binding effect, but which nevertheless form part of the Congressional Record — should be precise. Short, sweet, to the point. And I do somewhat see the point of not ceding the language (and the definition of “insurrection”) to the Democrat narrative. 

That said, the true test of this stance — and that of any other members of Congress who voted against the measure due to its wording, not the underlying premise — would be to submit a more narrowly tailored measure with factual, non-argumentative language and see if that would pass. Though I suspect the House has bigger fish to fry at the moment. 

4 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. I’ve about had it with Republicans doing NOTHING. All they do is run their mouth. An outright TRAITOR in the white house with a family that is robbing America blind andaughing in our faces. We are being inveded by commies and radical Muslims and they can not do anything. Their a waste of fuggin time. I’m not voting no more period. Just buy another gun and 5000 rounds today.

  2. Not so conservative is Mr. Chip. Showing his true color its just a wide yellow stain on.his back and a weak excuse. This woman is a terrorist supporter and a loudmouth. She should be expelled, citizenship revoked and deported. Our *elected* politicians do not look out for we the people or our country. We have allow this race/religion to dictate here in America. They do not assimilate into the American culture and hold religious beliefs above our constitution. Its something when other middle eastern countries refuse to have the Palestinians into their own countries. One.country said *they are to disruptive* to put it mildly. I think that there is no difference between Republicans and democrats just different cheeks on the same corrupt ass.

  3. chip roy is disappointing many republicans. WHAT EXACTLY WOULD BE THE REASON U VOTED TO KEEP THIS TRAITOR IN CONGRESS. SHE HATES AMERICA, THAT ALONE SHOULD BE GROUNDS FOR HER DISMISSAL.

    I DONT UNDERSTAND HOW U COULD GO AGAINST LOGIC AND DOING THE RIGHT THING. SHE HAS TRASHED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND OUR COUNTRY. SHE IS Racist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Non-Binary CUNY Professor Filmed Ripping down Missing Israeli Posters, Attacking Onlooker

Embattled New York Representative George Santos Wins House Vote to Avoid Expulsion